Comparison: Tristar Ecopower 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Budget

Tristar

Ecopower 4

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Ecopower 4

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

2

10

6

4

3

Best position

#7

#2

#3

#2

Average position

19.0

6.0

4.7

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

36

109

146

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Tristar Ecopower 4

51%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Tristar Ecopower 4

42%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Tristar Ecopower 4

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Tristar Ecopower 4

37%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Tristar Ecopower 4

58%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Dry

Tristar Ecopower 4

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Tristar Ecopower 4

52%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Tristar Ecopower 4

81%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Tristar Ecopower 4

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Tristar Ecopower 4

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Tristar Ecopower 4

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Tristar Ecopower 4

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Tristar Ecopower 4 vs Apollo Alnac 4G

Tristar Ecopower 4 vs Avon ZV7

Tristar Ecopower 4 vs Nexen N blue HD Plus

Tristar Ecopower 4 vs Riken Road Performance

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: Tristar Ecopower 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Ecopower 4

Ecsta HS52

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison