18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Tristar Ecopower 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Tristar
Ecopower 4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
2
10
3
1
Best position
#7
#2
#2
#1
Average position
19.0
6.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
36
109
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Tristar Ecopower 4
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Tristar Ecopower 4
42%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Tristar Ecopower 4
37%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Tristar Ecopower 4
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Tristar Ecopower 4
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Tristar Ecopower 4
52%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Tristar Ecopower 4
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Costs
Tristar Ecopower 4
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Tristar Ecopower 4
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Comfort
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store