18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Tristar Ecopower 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Tristar
Ecopower 4
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
2
10
3
3
Best position
#7
#2
#2
#2
Average position
19.0
6.0
3.7
3.7
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
36
109
36
36
Wet
Tristar Ecopower 4
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Tristar Ecopower 4
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Tristar Ecopower 4
42%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Tristar Ecopower 4
37%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Dry
Tristar Ecopower 4
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
Tristar Ecopower 4
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry braking
Tristar Ecopower 4
52%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Comfort
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Costs
Tristar Ecopower 4
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Tristar Ecopower 4
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store