18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Tristar Ecopower 4 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Tristar
Ecopower 4
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
2
14
10
Best position
#7
#1
#2
Average position
19.0
3.6
6.0
Latest test
2024
2025
2026
Available sizes
36
194
109

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Tristar Ecopower 4
51%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Tristar Ecopower 4
42%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Tristar Ecopower 4
37%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Wet handling
Tristar Ecopower 4
58%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Dry
Tristar Ecopower 4
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Tristar Ecopower 4
52%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Dry handling
Tristar Ecopower 4
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Comfort
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Exterior noise
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Costs
Tristar Ecopower 4
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Rolling resistance
Tristar Ecopower 4
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store