18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Tristar Ecopower 4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Dunlop Winter

Test Profile

Tristar
Ecopower 4
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Dunlop
Winter
Number of tests
2
23
2
Best position
#7
#1
#1
Average position
19.0
6.7
1.5
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
36
107
66

Wet

Wet
Tristar Ecopower 4
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Wet handling
Tristar Ecopower 4
58%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Aquaplaning - cross
Tristar Ecopower 4
42%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Wet braking
Tristar Ecopower 4
37%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Dunlop Winter
84%

Dry

Dry
Tristar Ecopower 4
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Dry handling
Tristar Ecopower 4
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Dry braking
Tristar Ecopower 4
52%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Dunlop Winter
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Exterior noise
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Dunlop Winter
87%

Costs

Costs
Tristar Ecopower 4
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Rolling resistance
Tristar Ecopower 4
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Dunlop Winter
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison