18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Tristar Ecopower 4 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Tristar
Ecopower 4
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
2
23
14
Best position
#7
#1
#1
Average position
19.0
6.7
3.6
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
36
107
194

Wet

Wet
Tristar Ecopower 4
51%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet handling
Tristar Ecopower 4
58%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Aquaplaning - cross
Tristar Ecopower 4
42%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet braking
Tristar Ecopower 4
37%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%

Dry

Dry
Tristar Ecopower 4
72%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry handling
Tristar Ecopower 4
81%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry braking
Tristar Ecopower 4
52%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%

Comfort

Comfort
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Tristar Ecopower 4
63%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%

Costs

Costs
Tristar Ecopower 4
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Tristar Ecopower 4
70%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison