18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Triangle Effexsport TH202 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Test Profile

Triangle
Effexsport TH202
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Number of tests
2
10
10
Best position
#7
#2
#3
Average position
8.0
6.0
7.6
Latest test
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
35
109
87

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Triangle Effexsport TH202
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
76%
Wet braking
Triangle Effexsport TH202
44%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Wet handling
Triangle Effexsport TH202
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
Triangle Effexsport TH202
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
78%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Triangle Effexsport TH202
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82%
Dry
Triangle Effexsport TH202
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
73%
Dry braking
Triangle Effexsport TH202
46%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Dry handling
Triangle Effexsport TH202
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
74%
Comfort
Triangle Effexsport TH202
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82%
Exterior noise
Triangle Effexsport TH202
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
85%
Comfort
Triangle Effexsport TH202
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
80%
Costs
Triangle Effexsport TH202
42%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
71%
Rolling resistance
Triangle Effexsport TH202
42%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store