18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Triangle Effexsport TH202 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Triangle Effexsport TH202
TriangleTriangle

Effexsport TH202

1.9
R16 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Triangle
Effexsport TH202
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
2
10
3
28
Best position
#7
#2
#2
#1
Average position
8.0
6.0
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
35
109
36
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Triangle Effexsport TH202
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Triangle Effexsport TH202
97%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Triangle Effexsport TH202
93%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
Triangle Effexsport TH202
44%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet handling
Triangle Effexsport TH202
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Comfort
Confidence
Triangle Effexsport TH202
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Triangle Effexsport TH202
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Triangle Effexsport TH202
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Dry
Confidence
Triangle Effexsport TH202
51%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Triangle Effexsport TH202
46%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Triangle Effexsport TH202
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Costs
Confidence
Triangle Effexsport TH202
42%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Triangle Effexsport TH202
42%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Triangle Effexsport TH202 vs Goodride Solmax 1Triangle Effexsport TH202 vs Avon ZV7Triangle Effexsport TH202 vs Federal Evoluzion ST-1Triangle Effexsport TH202 vs Viking Protech NewGenKumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNKumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenGTMaxxis

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store