18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Toyo Proxes CF2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. Pirelli P Zero Winter 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Toyo
Proxes CF2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Pirelli
P Zero Winter 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
2
16
2
18
49
23
Best position
#8
#3
#1
#1
#1
#1
Average position
17.5
5.5
2.0
6.1
3.2
3.3
Latest test
2019
2023
2025
2024
2024
2025
Available sizes
75
153
48
47
213
176

Wet

Wet
Toyo Proxes CF2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet braking
Toyo Proxes CF2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Wet circle cornering
Toyo Proxes CF2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Toyo Proxes CF2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
13%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Wet handling
Toyo Proxes CF2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Toyo Proxes CF2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Toyo Proxes CF2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Interior noise
Toyo Proxes CF2
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
85%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%

Dry

Dry
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry driving behavior
Toyo Proxes CF2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
83%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
76%

Costs

Costs
Toyo Proxes CF2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Fuel efficiency
Toyo Proxes CF2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
91%
Mileage
Toyo Proxes CF2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Pirelli P Zero Winter 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store