18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Sunfull SF-888 vs. Vredestein Ultrac+ vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Sunfull
SF-888
Vredestein
Ultrac+
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
3
10
Best position
#14
#10
#2
Average position
14.0
10.7
6.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
7
79
109

Wet

Wet
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet braking
Sunfull SF-888
33%
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sunfull SF-888
73%
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Wet handling
Sunfull SF-888
57%
Vredestein Ultrac+
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sunfull SF-888
71%
Vredestein Ultrac+
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%

Dry

Dry
Vredestein Ultrac+
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry braking
Sunfull SF-888
67%
Vredestein Ultrac+
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Dry handling
Sunfull SF-888
66%
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Costs

Costs
Vredestein Ultrac+
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Rolling resistance
Sunfull SF-888
45%
Vredestein Ultrac+
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Mileage
Sunfull SF-888
77%
Vredestein Ultrac+
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%

Comfort

Comfort
Vredestein Ultrac+
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Comfort
Sunfull SF-888
57%
Vredestein Ultrac+
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Exterior noise
Sunfull SF-888
74%
Vredestein Ultrac+
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store