18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Sunfull SF-888 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Sunfull
SF-888
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
10
28
Best position
#14
#2
#1
Average position
14.0
6.0
2.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
7
109
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sunfull SF-888
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Wet handling
Sunfull SF-888
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sunfull SF-888
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet braking
Sunfull SF-888
33%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Sunfull SF-888
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Sunfull SF-888
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Costs
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Mileage
Sunfull SF-888
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Sunfull SF-888
45%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Comfort
Sunfull SF-888
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Exterior noise
Sunfull SF-888
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store