Segment
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Premium2. Star Performer UHP-3 Lowcost
Comparison: Star Performer UHP-3 vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Star) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Star (15%). The first tyre test of Star Performer UHP-3 was done in 2020, compared to 2021 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 245/40 R19 test, where both the Performer UHP-3 and the Potenza Sport were tested.
| # | Star Performer UHP-3
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Very good
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry steering response
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Star Performer UHP-3 Rating: Not recommended | 4- | 3+ | |||||
| Bridgestone Potenza Sport Rating: Good | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
