18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Sava Perfecta vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Sava
Perfecta
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
10
3
3
Best position
#14
#2
#2
#1
Average position
14.0
6.0
3.7
1.3
Latest test
2018
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
46
109
36
23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Sava Perfecta
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Perfecta
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Wet braking
Sava Perfecta
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Perfecta
39%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Perfecta
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Wet handling
Sava Perfecta
26%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Comfort
Sava Perfecta
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Exterior noise
Sava Perfecta
41%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Dry
Sava Perfecta
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Costs
Sava Perfecta
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Mileage
Sava Perfecta
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store