Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Budget

Sava

Intensa UHP 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Intensa UHP 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

16

4

1

28

Best position

#2

#3

#1

Average position

13.7

12.0

1.0

2.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

76

111

66

68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Sava Intensa UHP 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa UHP 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa UHP 2

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa UHP 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa UHP 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa UHP 2

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Dry

Sava Intensa UHP 2

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Dry braking

Sava Intensa UHP 2

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

Dry handling

Sava Intensa UHP 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Comfort

Sava Intensa UHP 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa UHP 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Comfort

Sava Intensa UHP 2

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

71%

Costs

Sava Intensa UHP 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

Mileage

Sava Intensa UHP 2

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Rolling resistance

Sava Intensa UHP 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Price/value

Sava Intensa UHP 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Fulda SportControl 2

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Linglong Sport Master

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Debica Presto UHP 2

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Browse by brand

Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Intensa UHP 2

e.Primacy

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison