Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Budget

Sava

Intensa UHP 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Intensa UHP 2

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

16

3

6

28

Best position

#2

#3

#1

Average position

13.7

3.7

4.7

2.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

76

36

146

67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Sava Intensa UHP 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa UHP 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa UHP 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa UHP 2

64%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa UHP 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa UHP 2

65%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Dry

Sava Intensa UHP 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Dry braking

Sava Intensa UHP 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Continental PremiumContact 7

87%

Dry handling

Sava Intensa UHP 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Comfort

Sava Intensa UHP 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa UHP 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Comfort

Sava Intensa UHP 2

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

71%

Costs

Sava Intensa UHP 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

Mileage

Sava Intensa UHP 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Rolling resistance

Sava Intensa UHP 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Price/value

Sava Intensa UHP 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Fulda SportControl 2

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Linglong Sport Master

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs Debica Presto UHP 2

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Intensa UHP 2

e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison