Comparison: Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. Cooper Zeon CS8 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

In this head-to-head summer tyre comparison we examine the Sava Intensa UHP 2 and the Cooper Zeon CS8, summarising available test data, strengths and weaknesses, and which tyre performs better overall.

Quick data points: Sava Intensa UHP 2 scored 67% in our rating and finished 11th out of 52 in the AutoBild test. The Cooper Zeon CS8 scored 34% and finished 19th out of 52 in the same AutoBild comparison. The Cooper is manufactured in GB.

What the tests say — Sava Intensa UHP 2
AutoBild highlights Sava’s notable advantages: excellent aquaplaning reserves (cross), stable dry handling, short wet and dry braking distances, good ride comfort and an attractive price/value ratio. The main recorded downside is limited tread life, meaning wear may be faster than premium rivals. Summarising the test feedback: the Sava is a balanced performer that excels in wet safety and everyday ride comfort while offering strong value for money.

What the tests say — Cooper Zeon CS8
Cooper’s results are noticeably weaker in the shared tests. With a lower overall rating and a mid-table AutoBild ranking (19/52), the Zeon CS8 did not stand out in the comparative data we have. Test metrics show the Cooper trails the Sava in the combined results, and the lower score reflects shortcomings in the core areas where premium or better value competitors perform: braking, handling consistency and overall test ranking.

Head-to-head comparison

• Wet safety & aquaplaning: Sava is clearly stronger — AutoBild specifically notes very good aquaplaning reserves for the Intensa UHP 2.


• Dry handling & braking: Sava again leads with stable dry behaviour and short dry braking distances reported in tests.


• Comfort & NVH: Sava is described as having good comfort; Cooper lacks test highlights here.


• Wear & longevity: Sava’s known weakness is limited tread life; Cooper’s longevity is not highlighted positively in the available data.


• Value: Sava scores well on price/value, making it attractive for buyers prioritising safety and comfort on a budget.

Overall verdict
Across the shared test results, the Sava Intensa UHP 2 is the stronger tyre: it scored markedly higher (67% vs 34%) and placed better in AutoBild (11th vs 19th). Its clear strengths are wet performance, stable dry handling and good comfort at an attractive price — making it the better pick for most drivers seeking a balanced summer tyre. The main trade-off is reduced tread life, so drivers covering very high annual mileage should weigh that factor.

The Cooper Zeon CS8 is the weaker contender in available tests. With a lower overall rating and no strong positive callouts from AutoBild, it generally lags behind the Sava in the most important safety and handling metrics covered by the tests.

Replacement status: there is no newer replacement model listed for either tyre in our data, so neither is flagged as discontinued-and-replaced.

More information: manufacturer pages — Sava and Cooper.