18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
4
10
3
28
Best position
#12
#2
#2
#1
Average position
18.3
6.0
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2024
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
22
109
36
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Sava Intensa HP2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Comfort
Sava Intensa HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Dry
Sava Intensa HP2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Sava Intensa HP2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Costs
Sava Intensa HP2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store