Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Budget

Sava

Intensa HP

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Intensa HP

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Number of tests

4

3

4

1

28

Best position

#8

#2

#1

Average position

13.5

3.7

3.3

1.0

2.3

Latest test

2018

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

61

36

40

66

68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Wet braking

Sava Intensa HP

88%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Wet circle cornering

Sava Intensa HP

67%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Continental PremiumContact 7

80%

Wet handling

Sava Intensa HP

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

79%

Dry

Sava Intensa HP

76%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

89%

Costs

Sava Intensa HP

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Continental PremiumContact 7

74%

Mileage

Sava Intensa HP

80%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Comfort

Sava Intensa HP

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

67%

Exterior noise

Sava Intensa HP

64%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

72%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Sava Intensa HP vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Sava Intensa HP vs Nokian Wetproof

Sava Intensa HP vs Dunlop Sport BluResponse

Sava Intensa HP vs Continental UltraContact

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Browse by brand

GT

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Intensa HP

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison