18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Sava Intensa HP vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

Sava
Intensa HP
Continental
UltraContact
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
4
1
10
4
Best position
#8
#7
#2
#3
Average position
13.5
7.0
6.0
12.0
Latest test
2018
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
61
88
109
111

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Wet handling
Sava Intensa HP
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Wet braking
Sava Intensa HP
88%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Wet circle cornering
Sava Intensa HP
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Costs
Sava Intensa HP
81%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Mileage
Sava Intensa HP
80%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Comfort
Sava Intensa HP
72%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Exterior noise
Sava Intensa HP
64%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Dry
Sava Intensa HP
76%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store