18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Firestone Winterhawk 4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Firestone (56%). In this particular case, the Firestone Winterhawk 4 has a better rating of 56% compared to 41% of the Nokian WR Snowproof. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof was done in 2019, compared to 2020 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the WR Snowproof and the Winterhawk 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 4 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the WR Snowproof is made in Finland/Russian Federation and Winterhawk 4 is made in Italy.

Test Profile

Nokian
WR Snowproof
Firestone
Winterhawk 4
Number of tests
14
19
Best position
#5
#5
Average position
11.1
10.7
Latest test
2023
2025
Available sizes
60
102

Dry

Dry
Nokian WR Snowproof
81%

Snow

Snow
Nokian WR Snowproof
79%

Wet

Wet
Nokian WR Snowproof
67%

Costs

Costs
Nokian WR Snowproof
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian WR Snowproof
84%

Ice

Ice
Nokian WR Snowproof
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2021205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison