18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Nokian WR Snowproof P has a better rating of 67% compared to 55% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the WR Snowproof P and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings.

Test Profile

Nokian
WR Snowproof P
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Number of tests
7
10
Best position
#4
#2
Average position
9.7
12.2
Latest test
2025
2024
Available sizes
55
207

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store