18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Nokian WetProofUpper-middle
NokianNokian

WetProof

5.9
R14 – R20
Firestone RoadhawkUpper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk

5.2
R15 – R21
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Also compare with
UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Nokian
WetProof
Firestone
Roadhawk
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
14
21
10
14
4
Best position
#1
#2
#2
#8
#2
Average position
5.6
11.9
6.0
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2023
2024
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
47
165
109
153
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Nokian WetProof
84%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian WetProof
72%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian WetProof
81%
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet handling
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet braking
Nokian WetProof
85%
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian WetProof
91%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet side guide
Nokian WetProof
89%
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Wet performance
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
95%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry
Confidence
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry lane changing
Nokian WetProof
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry driving behavior
Nokian WetProof
71%
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry performance
Nokian WetProof
80%
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Comfort
Confidence
Nokian WetProof
79%
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian WetProof
86%
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Nokian WetProof
87%
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Interior noise
Nokian WetProof
69%
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Costs
Confidence
Nokian WetProof
60%
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Nokian WetProof
61%
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Nokian WetProof
56%
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Price/value
Nokian WetProof
46%
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Fuel efficiency
Nokian WetProof
78%
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Nokian WetProof vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Nokian WetProof vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Nokian WetProof vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUNFirestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenGTMaxxis

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store