18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian WetProof vs. Continental UltraContact

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 59% compared to 53% of the Continental UltraContact. The first tyre test of Nokian WetProof was done in 2019, compared to 2023 when was the Continental UltraContact first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the WetProof and the UltraContact were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian WetProof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Continental UltraContact also have A wet ratings. We also know where WetProof is made - Finland.

Test Profile

Nokian
WetProof
Continental
UltraContact
Number of tests
14
1
Best position
#1
#7
Average position
5.6
7.0
Latest test
2023
2023
Available sizes
47
88

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian WetProof
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store