Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Nokian

Wetproof SUV

R16 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wetproof SUV

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

3

21

4

3

Best position

#5

#2

Average position

5.3

11.9

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2022

2024

2026

2025

Available sizes

27

165

40

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian Wetproof SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Wetproof SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Wetproof SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Nokian Wetproof SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Wetproof SUV

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Offroad

Nokian Wetproof SUV

79%

Comfort

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Nokian Wetproof SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Costs

Nokian Wetproof SUV

64%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Wetproof SUV

64%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Nokian Wetproof SUV vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Nokian Wetproof SUV vs Cooper ZEON 4xS Sport

Nokian Wetproof SUV vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Falken e.Ziex

Wetproof SUV

Roadhawk

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison