Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Nokian

Wetproof SUV

R16 – R19

VS

Upper-middle

Firestone

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wetproof SUV

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

3

21

3

4

Best position

#5

#2

Average position

5.3

11.9

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2022

2024

2025

2026

Available sizes

27

165

36

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian Wetproof SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Wetproof SUV

79%

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Wetproof SUV

81%

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Wet braking

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Wet handling

Nokian Wetproof SUV

84%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Wetproof SUV

75%

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Offroad

Nokian Wetproof SUV

79%

Comfort

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

Nokian Wetproof SUV

66%

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

90%

Dry

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry braking

Nokian Wetproof SUV

82%

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Dry handling

Nokian Wetproof SUV

83%

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Costs

Nokian Wetproof SUV

64%

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Wetproof SUV

64%

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3

Also compare

Nokian Wetproof SUV vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Nokian Wetproof SUV vs Cooper ZEON 4xS Sport

Nokian Wetproof SUV vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Firestone Roadhawk vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Uniroyal RainSport 5

Firestone Roadhawk vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Firestone Roadhawk vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Wetproof SUV vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Wetproof SUV

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison