Segment
2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Nokian (60%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 has a better rating of 95% compared to 61% of the Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 235/50 R19 test, where both the Snowproof 2 SUV and the UltraGrip Performance 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (54%) of the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 also have B wet ratings.
| # | Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Upper-middle
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Recommended
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended2. Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Sufficient
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nokian Snowproof 2 SUV Rating: Sufficient | |||||||
| Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||