18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Sava Intensa UHP 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Sava
Intensa UHP 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
3
16
4
4
28
Best position
#6
#2
#2
#3
#1
Average position
9.0
13.7
3.3
12.0
2.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
91
76
40
111
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Sava Intensa UHP 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Sava Intensa UHP 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store