18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Number of tests
3
4
5
3
4
14
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#2
#2
#2
Average position
9.0
12.0
2.8
3.7
3.3
5.5
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
91
111
139
36
40
700

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
80%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
82%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
85%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
59%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison