18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
3
4
1
4
28
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
12.0
1.0
3.3
2.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
91
111
66
40
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store