18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
3
4
1
3
4
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
9.0
12.0
1.0
1.3
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
91
111
66
23
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dry
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Costs
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store