18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
3
4
4
23
3
28
Best position
#6
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
12.0
3.3
3.3
3.7
2.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
91
111
40
176
36
68

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store