18 shops · 56 ·847+ products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Nokian Powerproof 2Upper-middle
NokianNokian

Powerproof 2

7.6
R16 – R21
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.7
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
3
4
18
5
28
4
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
Average position
9.0
12.0
6.1
2.8
2.3
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
91
111
47
139
68
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Dry
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Comfort
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Costs
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVsBest dry-handling tyresBest rain tyresBest handling tyresQuietest tyresMost economical tyresBest anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Also compare

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich AdvantageMichelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformanceGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato P7Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4Hankook Ventus Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

Browse by brand

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearNokianFalkenKumhoVredesteinContinentalNexenGTMaxxis

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store