18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
SportContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
3
4
18
16
4
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
9.0
12.0
6.1
1.2
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2024
2026
2026
Available sizes
91
111
47
124
40

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Continental SportContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison