18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
3
4
17
4
23
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
12.0
1.7
3.3
3.3
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
91
111
80
40
176

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison