18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
3
4
28
4
5
Best position
#6
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
12.0
2.3
3.3
2.8
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
91
111
67
40
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store