Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Powerproof 2

Competus Winter 2+

Advantage

e.Ziex

Number of tests

3

1

14

3

Best position

#6

#4

#8

#2

Average position

9.0

4.0

13.4

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

91

16

153

36

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian Powerproof 2

67%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

93%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

72%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

94%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof 2

72%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

100%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof 2

52%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

75%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

95%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Powerproof 2

75%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Nokian Powerproof 2

68%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

86%

BFGoodrich Advantage

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

76%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

76%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof 2

77%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

87%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

76%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

65%

BFGoodrich Advantage

87%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Nokian Powerproof 2

79%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Lassa Competus Winter 2+

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

66%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Maxxis Premitra HP5

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Michelin Primacy 4

BFGoodrich Advantage vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Falken e.Ziex vs Falken E.Ziex

Falken e.Ziex vs Continental UltraContact NXT

Falken e.Ziex vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Falken e.Ziex vs Michelin E.Primacy

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Lassa Competus Winter 2+ vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex

Powerproof 2

Competus Winter 2+

Advantage

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison