18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
3
3
4
3
14
Best position
#6
#4
#2
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
4.3
3.3
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
91
99
40
36
194

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%
Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store