Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Powerproof 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

3

18

4

3

Best position

#6

#1

#3

#2

#1

Average position

9.0

6.1

12.0

3.3

3.7

1.3

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

91

47

111

40

36

23

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian Powerproof 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof 2

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Powerproof 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Dry

Nokian Powerproof 2

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

90%

Costs

Nokian Powerproof 2

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Mileage

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Powerproof 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Tread pattern comparison

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison