18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
SportContact 7
Number of tests
3
18
4
4
16
Best position
#6
#1
#3
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
6.1
12.0
3.3
1.2
Latest test
2026
2024
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
91
47
111
40
124

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental SportContact 7
87%
Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental SportContact 7
96%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental SportContact 7
94%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental SportContact 7
75%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental SportContact 7
81%
Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental SportContact 7
77%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store