Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Upper-middle

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Powerproof 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Number of tests

3

18

4

3

4

Best position

#6

#1

#3

#1

#2

Average position

9.0

6.1

12.0

1.3

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2026

2024

2025

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

91

47

111

23

36

40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian Powerproof 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Continental UltraContact NXT

74%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof 2

52%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

71%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Continental UltraContact NXT

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

84%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Powerproof 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Dry

Nokian Powerproof 2

68%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

93%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

79%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

86%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

82%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

98%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Dry lane changing

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

Continental UltraContact NXT

100%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

82%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

91%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

80%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

76%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

90%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Costs

Nokian Powerproof 2

79%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

84%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

83%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

81%

Mileage

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

85%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

VS

Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6

Also compare

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Michelin Primacy 5

Michelin e.Primacy vs Bridgestone Turanza T005

Michelin e.Primacy vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Michelin e.Primacy vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Powerproof 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Tread pattern comparison

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison