18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Blizzak 6
Number of tests
3
18
4
5
3
14
Best position
#6
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
6.1
3.3
2.2
3.7
3.6
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
91
47
40
63
36
194

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
72%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
83%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
73%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
61%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
82%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
92%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
85%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
41%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison