18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance+
Number of tests
3
18
4
17
23
Best position
#6
#1
#2
#1
#1
Average position
9.0
6.1
3.3
1.7
3.3
Latest test
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
91
47
40
80
176

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
83%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
89%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
82%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
74%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
80%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
84%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+
81%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison