18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact
Michelin
e.Primacy
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
3
18
1
4
6
Best position
#6
#1
#7
#3
#3
Average position
9.0
6.1
7.0
12.0
4.7
Latest test
2026
2024
2023
2025
2026
Available sizes
91
47
88
111
146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store