18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Falken
EuroWinter HS02
Nokian
WR Snowproof P
Number of tests
3
4
7
Best position
#6
#7
#4
Average position
9.0
12.3
9.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
91
103
55

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
64%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
66%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
74%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
35%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
79%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
60%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
61%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
74%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
87%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
75%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
90%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
74%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
60%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
88%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
84%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
85%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
84%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
77%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Falken EuroWinter HS02
85%
Nokian WR Snowproof P
92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison