18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
3
3
17
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
3.7
1.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
91
36
80

Wet

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%

Dry

Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
95%

Costs

Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison