Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Upper-middle

Nokian

Powerproof 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Powerproof 2

UltraContact

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Number of tests

3

1

10

4

Best position

#6

#7

#2

#3

Average position

9.0

7.0

6.0

12.0

Latest test

2026

2023

2026

2025

Available sizes

91

87

109

111

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet

Nokian Powerproof 2

67%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Nokian Powerproof 2

52%

Continental UltraContact

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

68%

Wet handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Wet braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

72%

Continental UltraContact

85%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Aquaplaning - cross

Nokian Powerproof 2

72%

Continental UltraContact

58%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

56%

Wet circle cornering

Nokian Powerproof 2

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

64%

Dry

Nokian Powerproof 2

68%

Continental UltraContact

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

85%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Dry braking

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Continental UltraContact

91%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

83%

Dry handling

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

76%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Michelin e.Primacy

88%

Exterior noise

Nokian Powerproof 2

77%

Continental UltraContact

75%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

90%

Comfort

Nokian Powerproof 2

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

87%

Costs

Nokian Powerproof 2

79%

Continental UltraContact

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Rolling resistance

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Mileage

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Continental UltraContact

88%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

54%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2

Continental UltraContact

Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Explore rankings

Best tyres for EVs Best dry-handling tyres Best rain tyres Best handling tyres Quietest tyres Most economical tyres Best anti-aquaplaning tyres

Popular tyre comparisons

VS

Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO

VS

Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6

VS

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 4

VS

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2

VS

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870

Also compare

Continental UltraContact vs Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

Continental UltraContact vs Firestone Roadhawk

Continental UltraContact vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5

Continental UltraContact vs Semperit Speed-Life 3

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs BFGoodrich Advantage

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 ECORUN

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Nokian Wetproof

Browse by brand

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Powerproof 2

UltraContact

Ecsta HS52

e.Primacy

Test Profile

Tread pattern comparison

Dimensions and prices

Explore rankings

Popular tyre comparisons

Also compare

Browse by brand

Add to comparison