18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Continental
UltraContact
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
Number of tests
3
1
18
14
4
Best position
#6
#7
#1
#8
#3
Average position
9.0
7.0
6.1
13.4
12.0
Latest test
2026
2023
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
91
88
47
153
111

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Continental UltraContact
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental UltraContact
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental UltraContact
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Continental UltraContact
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store