18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental UltraContact vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Continental
UltraContact
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
3
1
14
4
6
Best position
#6
#7
#8
#2
#3
Average position
9.0
7.0
13.4
3.3
4.7
Latest test
2026
2023
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
91
88
153
40
146

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Continental UltraContact
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental UltraContact
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental UltraContact
58%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Dry
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Continental UltraContact
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Comfort
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Continental UltraContact
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Costs
Confidence
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental UltraContact
88%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Continental UltraContact
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store