18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
3
28
18
4
1
Best position
#6
#1
#1
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
2.3
6.1
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
91
67
47
40
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
Continental PremiumContact 7
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%

Tread pattern comparison

Nokian Powerproof 2
Continental PremiumContact 7
Drag to compare · Scroll to zoom · Double-click for 2×

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store