18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Nokian
Powerproof 2
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
3
14
4
4
3
5
Best position
#6
#8
#3
#2
#2
#1
Average position
9.0
13.4
12.0
3.3
3.7
2.8
Latest test
2026
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
91
153
111
40
36
139

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Nokian Powerproof 2
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Wet braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Aquaplaning - cross
Nokian Powerproof 2
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Nokian Powerproof 2
52%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Wet handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Wet circle cornering
Nokian Powerproof 2
75%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Dry
Nokian Powerproof 2
68%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Dry handling
Nokian Powerproof 2
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
93%
Dry braking
Nokian Powerproof 2
74%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
85%
Dry lane changing
Nokian Powerproof 2
42%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Costs
Nokian Powerproof 2
79%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Rolling resistance
Nokian Powerproof 2
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Hankook Ventus Evo
72%
Mileage
Nokian Powerproof 2
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Exterior noise
Nokian Powerproof 2
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Comfort
Nokian Powerproof 2
76%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Free — on the App Store

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.

View in App Store